|
|
Post by xveganx on Jul 7, 2005 17:14:38 GMT -5
I co-own an independant music store and produce music and have used herb the whole way. Oh great, weed has helped you be a capitalist.  |
|
|
|
Post by RFOTGuest on Jul 7, 2005 21:52:45 GMT -5
I wouldn't say that.. I hardly think of a small, cooperatively run music store as putting someone in the same class as the ruling capitalist class. (Unless that was meant humorously, in which case 'lol' or some similar internet abbreviation for that's funny).
|
|
Maz
Revolutionary
rock out
Posts: 106
|
Post by Maz on Jul 12, 2005 16:08:25 GMT -5
Since we're on the topic...are drugs really as dangerous as they're made out to be? It seems that different people react to drugs in very different ways. Even when you take a supposedly "hard" drug like cocaine it seems that some people are able to be social cocaine snorters with no real adverse affects on the rest of their lives and seemingly no serious addiction kicking in. Yet for other people it can get to be a pretty serious problem. What's going on here?
|
|
|
|
Post by RFOTGuest on Jul 12, 2005 20:34:06 GMT -5
What's going on is that everybody's body is different. Some people are just more physiologically predisposed to developing a chemical dependancy on something. Often, this is genetic. Some people are more psychologically predisposed to becoming dependant on a substance. And some are both.
Weed, for example, very rarely creates a chemical dependancy in users. Of all the smokers I do, which is a pretty big sample, only ONE ever became an addict - and that person had psychological problems, and a family history of drug abuse. It's the same with alcohol.. if you have somebody in your family who was an alcoholic, for some reason you're more likely to become one yourself.
|
|
|
|
Post by DFSDAF on Oct 14, 2007 20:56:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hkilt on Mar 25, 2008 2:46:47 GMT -5
|
|
