Post by viewer on Oct 21, 2004 1:21:05 GMT -5
I am seeing a lot of discussion about Nepal's Maoists on many different discussion boards.
What stands out to me though, is that a lot of people have heard about this from the bourgeois press, and are repeating accounts from the bourgeois press.
I don't see a problem with reading that (of course) or posting such accounts in threads for people to read.
But i think people need to be skeptical of these accounts (which often does NOT seem to be the case).
And I think we should promote revolutionary analyses of these developments -- which may not be as quick to appear from sources like awtw.org and rwor.org -- but are important for actually understanding what is going on and counteracting the growing and inevitable bourgeois ideological offensive against the revolution.
And I think we should consider promoting Li Onesto's dispatches (which are available on rwor.org/s/nepal.htm along with many other analyses.)
What stands out to me though, is that a lot of people have heard about this from the bourgeois press, and are repeating accounts from the bourgeois press.
I don't see a problem with reading that (of course) or posting such accounts in threads for people to read.
But i think people need to be skeptical of these accounts (which often does NOT seem to be the case).
And I think we should promote revolutionary analyses of these developments -- which may not be as quick to appear from sources like awtw.org and rwor.org -- but are important for actually understanding what is going on and counteracting the growing and inevitable bourgeois ideological offensive against the revolution.
And I think we should consider promoting Li Onesto's dispatches (which are available on rwor.org/s/nepal.htm along with many other analyses.)